I'll start by saying that the faculty is
great! There’s always something going on and it’s located in the center of
downtown where every building is either really old or really new and
interesting. With that in mind, the place is total chaos. The reason for this
is that the administration of the faculty hasn't been properly updated to the
current state of the place, and the changes that have been done, don’t work
with old administration. There are a lot of problems, but I think
the administration one is the base for the majority of them. I’m not really sure
which procedure needs to be taken, but the first step should pint towards acknowledging
every subject and class in the curriculum and making sure that the old and new
one are integrated.
The other part that need’s a change it’s
the attitude of a lot of students towards the career. Architecture works by
researching, experimenting and making projects. Even if the workshop teachers aren’t
the best (and I’m aware there are some pretty bad ones), the student has the professional
duty to develop a self-taught education, by proposing and experimenting. The lack
of this way of thinking is shown by the low quantity of research projects that
the students have developed during the past years (I think there were 28 in
2016, which is really low compared to UC with 84). The roll of the university
should be towards potentiating this behavior, by making spaces that supply
developing tools (like material research and development, multimedia, open
workshops etc.…) instead teaching class rooms without the infrastructure to
work while learning.
this dude didn't even go to the university.
In conclusion I’d say that yes, there are
a lot of problems on the faculty, but the addition of better infrastructure and
teachers won’t make us better professionals. We have to be curious and purposing
under any circumstance, because in the end, we do this for the passion that we
have for architecture.